The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Torrey Pines Biolabs
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 741K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mäkelä, O.
Right arrow Articles by Nossal, G. J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mäkelä, O.
Right arrow Articles by Nossal, G. J. V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 115, 231-244, Copyright, 1962, by The Rockefeller Institute

ARTICLE

AUTORADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES ON THE IMMUNE RESPONSE : II. DNA SYNTHESIS AMONGST SINGLE ANTIBODY-PRODUCING CELLS



O. Mäkelä M.D.1 and G. J. V. Nossal Ph.D.1

1 From the Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

The DNA-synthesizing capacity of single antibody-forming cells was tested by a combination of micromanipulatory and autoradiographic techniques. Rats were immunized with S. adelaide flagellin, a protein antigen known to contain significant contamination with somatic (O) antigen. Single cells from secondarily immunized rats were tested for production of anti-H and anti-O antibodies by previously described and newer techniques. Positive antibody producers were transferred onto clean dry slides by micromanipulation, and autoradiographs were performed. When rats had received tritiated thymidine 1 hour before killing, labeling of antibody-forming cells was taken to imply that the cell was preparing for further mitotic division. It was found that on the 2nd and 3rd day of a secondary response, many of the antibody-producing cells in the nodes (chiefly plasmablasts) were incorporating tritiated thymidine. At the height of the cellular response, however, at 4 and 5 days, the majority of active antibody producers (chiefly mature plasma cells) were incapable of DNA synthesis. There appeared to be an inverse relationship between the antibody-forming and DNA-synthesizing capacities of the cell population under study; as more of the cells studied formed detectable antibody, fewer of them incorporated the DNA precursor.

The age of plasma cells was also studied. Animals were killed at the height of the cellular immune response, having previously received an injection of tritiated thymidine 1 to 48 hours before killing; i.e., at 63 to 110 hours after their secondary stimulus. As the interval between isotope injection and killing increased, the proportion of antibody-forming cells showing labeling increased. With an interval of 30 hours, about half the antibody-forming cells were labeled and of 48 hours, over 95 per cent were labeled. This was taken as evidence that, few, if any, antibody-forming cells found at the height of a secondary response were more than 48 hours old.

On the basis of these experiments and those reported in the accompanying paper, a simplified scheme showing the development of an antibody-forming clone in the secondary response was proposed.

 Submitted on August 7, 1961


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS